Legal Opinion
In re Petition for Annexation of Certain Property to the Village of Plainfield
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 10, 1994No. 3—93—0739PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry
Objectors appeal from the decision of the circuit court finding that a petition to annex land was valid. We affirm.
I. FACTS
Five petitioners filed a petition to annex territory to the Village of Plainfield, Illinois (Plainfield). The petition alleged that the petitioners were more than 51% of the owners of record of the territory sought to be annexed; that there were no electors residing in the territory; that the territory was not situated within the limits of any municipality; and that the territory was contiguous to the Village of Plainfield. The petition was signed by the attorney…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Western National Bank v. Village of KildeerIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Estate of Johnson v. Condell Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Adkins v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- People Ex Rel. Scott v. College Hills Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Henry County Board v. Village of OrionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Cornman Tweedy 560, LLC v. City of Casa GrandeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- LaSalle National Bank v. City of Highland ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- West Suburban Bank v. City of West ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Board of Trustees of the Mokena Community Public Library District v. Village of Tinley ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.