Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. Village of South Pekin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1940No. 25616. Appellate Court reversed in part; county court affirmedPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

In a proceeding under the Disconnection act of 1935 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, chap. 24, par. 383d et seq.) the county court of Tazewell county entered an order disconnecting from the village of South Pekin certain described tracts of land referred to as tracts 1 to 6, inclusive. The village appealed and the Appellate Court reversed the judgment as to a part of tract 2, tracts 4, 5, and 6 and remanded the cause with directions as to such tracts. The owners of the several tracts obtained leave to appeal to this court. Tract 1 and a part of tract 2 are not involved on this appeal. The following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eddy v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Illinois Publishing & Printing Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Punke v. Village of ElliottIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Fowler v. Johnston City & Big Muddy Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brandt v. KellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. La Salle National Bank v. Village of Burr RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Indian Valley Golf Club, Inc. v. Village of Long GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Stiska v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  5. American Surety Co. v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API