Legal Opinion

Doty v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1985No. CR 84-159Published

1Per curiam

This appeal of a conviction under the new Omnibus DWI law is affirmed. All the arguments raised have been rejected in prior or contemporaneous cases.

The act is not void for vagueness. Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425, 678 S.W.2d 318 (1984) reh. den. 283 Ark. 434, 681 S.W.2d 395 (1984); Long v. State, 284 Ark. 21, 680 S.W.2d 686 (1984); Steele v. State, 284 Ark. 340, 681 S.W.2d 354 (1984). Doty’s argument that the act violates his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was rejected in Southern v. State, 284 Ark. 572, 683 S.W.2d 933 (1985), and Wells v. State, 285 Ark. 9, 684 S.W.2d 248 (1985).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Fleming v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Long v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Sparrow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Southern v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API