Legal Opinion
Hotard v. Murphy
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 2012No. 11-CA-1143PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge.
12The plaintiff/appellant appeals the trial court’s judgment which dismissed her workers’ compensation claim. For the reasons that follow, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Factual and Procedural Background
The plaintiff/appellant, Mrs. Sherri Ho-tard, filed a Disputed Claim for Compensation (1008 compensation claim) on October 31, 2007 due to a workplace injury that occurred while she was under the employ of the defendant/appellee, Murphy, Rogers, Sloss, and Gamble (Murphy Rogers). The 1008 compensation claim form contends that Mrs. Hotard fell on her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Dean v. Southmark Const.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Brown v. Coastal Const. & Engineering, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Rideaux v. Franklin Nursing HomeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Tate v. Cabot Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Summers v. Ritz-Carlton New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Bailey v. Jefferson Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Mendez v. Regional Transit AuthorityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Rixner v. East Jefferson General HospitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Mangiaracina v. Avis Budget Group Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.