Legal Opinion

Mendez v. Regional Transit Authority

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 2013No. 13-CA-297PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN J. WINDHORST, Judge.

| ¡..Claimant, Jose Mendez, appeals from a judgment rendered by the workers’ compensation court finding that Mendez failed to prove that his psoriatic arthritis was caused by his work-related accident, and therefore, he was not entitled to compensation for his condition. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the Office of Workers Compensation (OWC).

Mendez was employed by the Regional Transit Authority, TMSEL. He started working for the Transit Authority in December of 1978. In October of 1993, Mendez injured his back while lifting a power brake. He…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Royal Ins. v. Romain Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Middle Tennessee Council, Inc. v. FordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Dawson v. Terrebonne General Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Ponthier v. Vulcan Foundry, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sue Perry, Et Ux Versus Employers Insurance of WausauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
  2. Zachary Flores Versus Jefferson Feed and Garden SupplyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API