Legal Opinion
Summers v. Ritz-Carlton New Orleans
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 2015No. 14-CA-800PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST, Judge.
| gAppellants/defendants, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC (“The Ritz-Carlton”) and Marriott Claims Service (“MCS”), appeal the workers’ compensation judgment granting claimant/appellee, Phyllis Summers, wage benefits, medical benefits, and penalties and attorney’s fees. For the following reasons, the workers’ compensation judgment is affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.
Claimant was employed by The Ritz-Carlton as a hairdresser, nail technician, and make-up artist. On March 3, 2013, claimant arrived early to work to perform a pedicure service for a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- C. C. Elmer Tank Boiler Co. v. Art Cleaner & DyersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- Authement v. Shappert EngineeringSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miken Specialties v. AbarcaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Rixner v. East Jefferson General HospitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Tassin v. Touro InfirmaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Carlos A. Juarez Versus Aj Lazo Construction, LLC, and Louisiana Construction and Industry Self Insurer's Fund (Lci)Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
- D'Marrio Kendrick Versus Brown and RootLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.