Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 12, 2001No. 1220-00PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KellerKeller, P.J.

Can a successfully completed deferred adjudication be used to enhance punishment for a later offense when the provision permitting such enhancement did not exist at the time adjudication was deferred? We answer that question “no” and reverse the Court of Appeals’s judgment.

1. Background

In 1991, appellant pled guilty to the offense of indecency with a child in exchange for deferred adjudication. He successfully completed his deferred adjudication probation 1 but was later convicted of aggravated sexual assault. Over a defense ex post facto objection, the trial court permitted the State…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Grunsfeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by80 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A.V.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. in the Interest of E.M.N., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  3. State v. Collazo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. Nolan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Lindsay v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API