Legal Opinion

McClure v. Home Insurance

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County

Decided September 26, 1956No. 297Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cummins, J.,

This matter comes before us on preliminary objection in the nature of a motion for judgment to plaintiff’s complaint in assumpsit.

*262In paragraph 5 of the complaint plaintiff alleged as follows:

“On or about Thursday, January 3, 1956, the plaintiff’s 14-carat white gold engagement ring of the value of Five' Hundred Fifty ($550.00) Dollars and the plaintiff’s 14-carat white gold wedding band of the value of One Hundred Fifty ($150.00) Dollars were accidently destroyed by fire in the furnace of the plaintiff’s home, as covered in the aforesaid policy.”

It is apparent from the reading of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. RodgersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Reliance Insurance Co. v. NamanTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Mode, Ltd. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Youse v. Employers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Harter v. Ph&338nix Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API