Scott v. Rodgers
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.
The question presented is whether there be evidence tending to show the ten-years’ prescriptive title (articles 5675-56S2, R. S. 1911; articles 5510-5515, R. S. 1925) claimed by defendants in error and adjudged to them by the district court (without aid of a jury).
Since the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (297 S. W. 624) in respect to essential matters exhibits but ultimate conclusions, a somewhat detailed statement of facts shown in evidence is necessary here.
1. James English and wife in 1888 acquired a rectangular tract of land — 142 feet north, south by 500 feet east, west — near…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Eylar v. EylarTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Bracken v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Collum v. Sanger Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
- Bender v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1910
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1954
- Kidd v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Thompson v. MoorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Doherty v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- American Nat. Bank of Beaumont v. WingateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.