Legal Opinion

Scott v. Rodgers

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1928No. 1080-4970PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

The question presented is whether there be evidence tending to show the ten-years’ prescriptive title (articles 5675-56S2, R. S. 1911; articles 5510-5515, R. S. 1925) claimed by defendants in error and adjudged to them by the district court (without aid of a jury).

Since the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals (297 S. W. 624) in respect to essential matters exhibits but ultimate conclusions, a somewhat detailed statement of facts shown in evidence is necessary here.

1. James English and wife in 1888 acquired a rectangular tract of land — 142 feet north, south by 500 feet east, west — near…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Eylar v. EylarTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Bracken v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Collum v. Sanger Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bender v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Orsborn v. Deep Rock Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Kidd v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Thompson v. MoorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Doherty v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. American Nat. Bank of Beaumont v. WingateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API