Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miles A. Mathis, Jr., Theresa Mathis v. Bowater Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1993No. 91-6469, 92-5028Published

1DissentRyan, Circuit Judge

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Bowater Incorporated is a statutory employer entitled to the exclusive remedy provisions of Tennessee workers’ compensation law. I therefore respectfully dissent.

The policy behind Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-113 (1992) is

to insure as far as possible to all workers payment of benefits when they [are] injured in the course of their employment. ... The section passes coverage from employers who might not have coverage to intermediate or principal contractors who do have coverage. This prevents employers from contracting out normal work simply to avoid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stratton v. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Carpenter v. Hooker Chemical & Plastics Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  3. Acklie v. CarrierTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Fugunt v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  5. Manis v. AMERICAN CABLE SYSTEMS OF TENNESSEEDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API