Legal Opinion

California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials v. Noonan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 26, 2009No. CIV. S-06-532 FCD KJMPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge.

This matter is before the court on (1) plaintiff California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials (“plaintiff’ or “CAPEEM”) motion for partial summary judgment as to its Establishment Clause claim and (2) defendants’ 1 motion for summary judgment, or alternatively, partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs second amended complaint, alleging claims for violation of the Equal Protection, Establishment and Free Speech and Association Clauses. 2 Generally stated, in this action, plaintiff alleges the California State Board of Education (“SBE”)…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chinatown Neighborhood Ass'n v. HarrisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Citizens for Quality Educ. San Diego v. BarreraDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
  3. Doe v. Cape Henlopen School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  4. Cal. Parents for the Equal. of Educ. Materials v. TorlaksonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  5. California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials v. TorlaksonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API