Legal Opinion
California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials v. Torlakson
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 13, 2017No. 17-00635-CRBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS. CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiffs are California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials *1222(“CAPEEM”), an organization formed to promote an accurate portrayal of the Hindu religion in California, public schools, as well as several Hindu parents, individually •and on behalf of their s.chool-age children. See- generally Compl. (diet. 1). They have brought suit against several officials at the California Department of Education and members of the State Board of Education (collectively,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Capeem v. Tom TorlaksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Elizabeth Mirabelli and Lori Ann West, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, et al. v. Mark Olson, in his official capacity as President of the EUSD Board of Education, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Protective Life Insurance Company v. KallelDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024