Legal Opinion
City of Phoenix v. Fine
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 7, 1966No. 1 CA-CIV 188PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOFRIO, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Maricopa County deciding that under A.R.S. 13-531.01 four magazines were obscene and under A.R.S. 13-535 enjoining the defendant from sale or distribution of them. Four books involved in the trial were not found to be obscene. The plaintiff City appeals the ruling on these books. A cross appeal by the defendant attacks the ruling on the magazines.
Briefly, the facts are: The Assistant City Attorney acting for the plaintiff City went to a bookstore in downtown Phoenix controlled by the defendant to select items for a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Attwood v. PurcellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1975
- Vivian Arnold Realty Co. v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
- In Re Seven MagazinesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- NGC Theatre Corporation v. MummertArizona Supreme Court · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.