Legal Opinion

St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Lexington Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1996No. 95-20544PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

The primary issue presented by this appeal is the effect of conflicting “other insurance” clauses on the obligations of primary and excess insurance carriers to contribute to a settlement entered into by the insured. Applying Texas law, the district court prorated liability first among the primary carriers, and then among the excess carriers, in proportion to the amount of insurance provided by the insurers’ respective policies. In the final analysis, proration as to the primary carriers was immaterial because they had to pay their full policy limits; however, the excess…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. American Centennial Insurance Co. v. Canal Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Neff v. American Dairy Queen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Pacific Indemnity Company v. Acel Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Access Telecom, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. Canal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Travelers Lloyds Insurance v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Downtown Barre Development v. C & S Wholesale Grocers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. Fina, Inc. v. ArcoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API