State Ex Rel. City of Excelsior Springs v. Smith
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
Original proceeding in mandamus. The city of Excelsior Springs seeks to compel the State Auditor to register certain bonds. The facts may be stated as follows:
In and about the city are mineral springs and wells. It is a widely known health resort. Indeed, it owes its existence and growth to the several varieties of mineral waters in that locality. In 1912 it acquired by condemnation Siloam Park, and in 1925 it acquired by condemnation Regent Park. In the condemnation proceedings benefits were assessed against the lands in the benefit district and paid by the owners of said lands. The parks…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Reichelderfer v. QuinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Dysart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Aldrich v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. City of SikestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- State Ex Rel. City of Fulton v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.