Legal Opinion

Broome v. Broome

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1951No. Civ. 17654PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Demurrer having been sustained to the fourth amended complaint, judgment that plaintiff take nothing was duly entered. On this appeal plaintiff demands a reversal on eight specified grounds which will appear as the story unfolds.

The Foubth Amended Complaint

The substance of the voluminous pleading is as follows: October 2, 1934, the parties executed an agreement settling their property rights and on the same day plaintiff instituted her action for divorce. The cause having come on regularly for trial on the following December 19th, an interlocutory decree was granted and the court confirmed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re Marriage of JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Sproul v. CuddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Heidlebaugh v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API