Legal Opinion

Rodney Garrott v. Pat Glebe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 22, 2015No. 14-35076UnpublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Washington state prisoner Rodney Gar-rott appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition. Garrott alleges that a Department of Corrections official falsely accused him of prison infractions, resulting in a loss of Earned Release Time (ERT) without due process of law. The Washington Supreme Court found that Garrott’s loss of ERT was not the result of disciplinary proceedings, and that he had received the limited due process to which he was entitled under Washington state law. The district court denied Gar-rott’s petition and dismissed the action. This court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gary Wayne Freeman v. Richard RideoutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Michael Hanrahan v. Michael P. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Robert D. Sprouse v. David Babcock, Charles Harper and Ronald G. WelderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In Re GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. (HC) Griffin v. FoulkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. (PC) Morgan v. EspinozaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. (PC) Morgan v. EspinozaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Bradford v. VoongDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. Bradford v. VoongDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API