Legal Opinion
Colin McDonald v. Webasto Roof Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 25, 2014No. 13-6375UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Webasto Roof Systems, Inc. rescinded its offer to employ Colin McDonald as a maintenance technician after a second pre-employment medical examination revealed a history of back injuries and a doctor opined that he “would not recommend that [McDonald] work within the job description provided.” McDonald sued, claiming that Webasto violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., by refusing to hire him because of his perceived impairments, and advancing state-law claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel. The district court granted summary judgment to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Grzyb v. EvansKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Firestone Textile Co. Division v. MeadowsKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
- Charles M. Brohm, M.D. v. Jh Properties, Inc., Doing Business as Jewish Hospital of Shelbyville, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Troy Pesterfield v. Tennessee Valley Authority Charles Dean, Marvin T. Runyon John WatersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coons v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Baker-Redman v. Premise Health Employer Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
- Clemans v. National Staffing Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Holum v. AECOM, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Otero v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.