Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Harbor
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 8, 1985No. 83-1147PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
465 So.2d 460 (1985)
Ex Parte Charles Michael HARBOR.
(Re: Charles Michael Harbor
v.
State).
83-1147.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
February 8, 1985.
George W. Andrews III, Birmingham, for petitioner.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Glenn L. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
2Per curiam
The writ is quashed as improvidently granted. We cannot agree with the petitioner's argument that the Supreme Court of the United States in Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 103 S.Ct. 3001, 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983), required appellate courts to test all sentences against the proscriptions of the cruel and unusual punishment…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
4Cited by21 opinions
- Kinder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Atwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Hammond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.