Legal Opinion

Hammond v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 12, 1986PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carl Dennis Hammond was convicted for the unlawful possession of phenmetrazine and sentenced to fifteen years' imprisonment. Four issues are raised on this appeal of that conviction.

I

The jury's verdict read: "We the jury find the defendant guilty of possession of phenmetrazine as charged in the indictment. We believe that it was constructive possession." Hammond contends that he "was merely a conduit, signing for what he considered a harmless package" and that the state failed to prove his constructive possession of the drugs. Appellant's brief, p. 34.

This issue is not preserved for review.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Van Antwerp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Nix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Yelton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stone v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. Rice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Bryan Pettibone v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. M.B. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API