Legal Opinion
Williams v. Advertising Sex LLC
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Decided October 26, 2005No. CIV.A. 1:05CV51PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SCOTT MOLES, WEB TRAFFIC INC., AND ZORG ENTERPRISES BY ALTERNATIVE MEANS UNDER FRCP 4(f)(3)
KEELEY, District Judge.
On October 11, 2005, the plaintiff, Allison Williams (‘Williams”), by her attorneys, Ste*485phen M. LaCagnin, Andrew M. Wright, and Woodrow E. Turner, moved this Court pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order permitting Williams to effect service of process on defendants Scott Moles, Web Traffic Inc., and Zorg Enterprises (“the defendants”) via electronic mail, international…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Broadfoot v. Diaz (In Re International Telemedia Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- FMAC Loan Receivables v. DagraDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Popular Enterprises, LLC v. Webcom Media Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Potash Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Wish Seller GooshellyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Buzz Photo v. People's Republic of ChinaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.