Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 8, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2005-1276PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Docs. Nos. 53 & 64]
JAMES S. GWIN, United States District Judge.
Plaintiff-Relator Harry Barko, a former subcontract administrator for ■ Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR) in Iraq, brings this action alleging violations of the False Claims Act 1 by Defendants KBR, its parent, Halliburton Company (Halliburton), related entities, and subcontractors Daoud & Partners, Inc. (Daoud) and EAMAR Company (EAMAR). Barko says that Defendants engaged in a scheme to defraud the United States by using a subcontracting procedure that vastly inflated the costs of constructing laundry…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bazarian International Financial Associates, LLC v. Desarrolloa Aerohotelco, C.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Estate of Esther Klieman v. Palestinian AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Gilmore v. Palestinian Interim Self-Government AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States Ex Rel. Purcell v. MWI Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.