Caine v. Foreman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff, as assignee of the Credit Utility Corporation, obtained judgment in this action against the defendant as an indorser, in the sum of $6,000, balance due upon a promissory note for the principal sum of $10,000, executed by the Cox-Klemin Aircraft Corporation. From this judgment the defendant appeals.
Upon this appeal two grounds are relied upon by appellant as sufficient reasons for reversal: 1st. That there is no evidence that the note in controversy was, at the date of its maturity, presented to the Cox-Klemin Aircraft Corporation, the party primarily liable for payment, or that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nelson v. GrondahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Hoffman v. HollingsworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Thorpe v. J. & J. H. Peck & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1855
3Cited by7 opinions
- Buffalo Pipeline Co. v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
- Allen v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- State v. DoudnaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Cartledge v. Sinclair Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- In Re KatcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.