Legal Opinion

State v. Payne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1987No. 66A85PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant contends, inter alia, that the trial court committed reversible error by communicating with the jurors out of open court and in the absence of the defendant, counsel, or a court reporter. We agree and hold that the defendant is entitled to a new trial. Because the defendant’s other assignments of error *139are not likely to arise upon retrial, we do not reach or discuss them.

A complete review of the evidence is not necessary to an understanding of the legal issues involved in this case. Briefly, the State’s evidence tended to show that the victim was killed with a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. People v. HeardMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. GolphinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. RoperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API