Legal Opinion

Home Real Estate Co. v. Winnants

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1919No. Civ. No. 2623PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiff has taken this appeal from a judgment rendered against it, entered after the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint. The judgment, in so far as it required money to be paid to the defendants, was only for a few dollars as costs incurred by the defendants.

Plaintiff’s first contention is that this judgment was erroneously entered because it had, prior to the date of the judgment, dismissed its- action. This claim arises because of the following situation, as shown by the record: Defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint was sustained and notice of that ruling was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldtree v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Scherff v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hopkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Canfield v. GreshamTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Christensen v. Dewor DevelopmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sheehy v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Provencher v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Conde v. Rivera SalamánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API