Home Real Estate Co. v. Winnants
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff has taken this appeal from a judgment rendered against it, entered after the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint. The judgment, in so far as it required money to be paid to the defendants, was only for a few dollars as costs incurred by the defendants.
Plaintiff’s first contention is that this judgment was erroneously entered because it had, prior to the date of the judgment, dismissed its- action. This claim arises because of the following situation, as shown by the record: Defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint was sustained and notice of that ruling was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goldtree v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Scherff v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Hopkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Canfield v. GreshamTexas Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Christensen v. Dewor DevelopmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Sheehy v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Provencher v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Conde v. Rivera SalamánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.