Legal Opinion

Provencher v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1935No. Civ. 9681PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

—This is an action brought by the plaintiffs for damages alleged to have been caused to the real property of plaintiffs by the construction of a pedestrian subway across the highway upon which plaintiffs’ property abuts. At the time of trial on September 18, 1933, the court sustained a general demurrer of one defendant to the amended complaint, and also sustained an objection of another defendant to the introduction of any evidence upon the ground that the amended complaint failed to state a cause of action. In so ruling the court made the following statement: “At this time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldtree v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Strupelle v. StrupelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. MacDermot v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Home Real Estate Co. v. WinnantsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. King v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Smith v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. London v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Parenti v. Lifeline Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API