Legal Opinion
MacHie v. Chardonnet
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 23, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2015-0630PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed suit in this Court based on events that occurred in a lawsuit in Maryland, which resulted in his settlement with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) for $130,000. Invoking diversity jurisdiction, plaintiff sues WMATA and WMATA attorneys. Brendan H. Chan-donnet, and Kathleen Carey. In addition, plaintiff sues his former attorney Eric Rosenberg of Rosenberg & Fayne, LLP, and attorneys Phillip R. Zuber and Emily Spiering of Sasscer, Clagett & Bucher (SCB…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Montes, Jr. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Narragansett Indian Tribe v. PollackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023