Legal Opinion

Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Pollack

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 27, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-2299Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NARRAGANSETT INDIAN TRIBE, : acting by and through the Narragansett : Indian Tribal Historic Preservation Office, : : Civil Action No.: 22-2299 (RC) Plaintiff, : : Re Document Nos.: 18, 31, 33 : v. : : STEPHANIE POLLACK, : Acting Administrator, Federal Highway : Administration, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE AGENCY’S MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL SUPPLEMENT TO ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD I. INTRODUCTION The…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API