Legal Opinion

Markham v. Duke Land & Improvement Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1931PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Upon the verdict returned by the jury the trial court adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the Corley Company and the city of Durham the sum of $3,750 and the costs of the action; that as between the defendants the liability of the Corley Company is primary and that of the city of Durham secondary; also that the city, if required to pay the judgment, or any part of it, shall be entitled to reimbursement by the Duke Land and Improvement Company, this provision obviously growing out of the contract between the land company and the city. All the defendants appealed, and as each assigns…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Concord.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Cole v. Industrial Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Bailey v. . WinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Revis v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Kinsey v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. WoodSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  3. Cacey v. Virginian Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  4. Smith v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Klassette v. Liggett Drug Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API