Legal Opinion

Stovall v. Breedlove

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1920No. 9774PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court; Ottawa County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by Priscilla Breedlove against James N. Stovall to cancel contract for sale ox land and other relief. Stipulation filed settling controversy, also settling controversy involved in ‘ three other eases brought by Frank T. Lamar against Breedlove and another. Judgment for Breedlove upon the stipulation, and Stovall and Lamar bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Ottawa county; Hon. Preston S. Davis, Judge.

On the 7th day of March, 1913, the defendant in error, Priscilla Breedlove, as plaintiff, commenced an action in the district court against James N. Stovall, defendant,, to cancel a contract of sale of 200 acres of land, entered into between the parties, the plaintiff alleging a breach thereof by the defendant, and the plaintiff sought to recover $3,300 damages, and to have $300 placed in escrow by the defendant declared forfeited to the plaintiff, and for a temporary and permanent injunction against the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Budd v. HoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Consolidated Steel & Wire Co. v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Hughes v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
  4. Botts v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Taylor v. . BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. PrivetteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Vidon v. RobertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API