Legal Opinion

Taylor v. . Brower

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

■MotioN for a Certiorari heard at' January Term, 1878, of .The Supreme Court. The defendant filed his petition for a certiorari at June Term, 1877, of this Court, and upon the hearing at this term the mótion was not allowed, and the petition dismissed.

1Opinion of the CourtFaircloth, J.

The rule for perfecting appeals under C. •C. P. was laid down in plain terms in Wade v. City of New Berne, 72 N. C. 498, and has been since approved several times. If the parties by‘express agreement appearing on record extend, the time allowed by law for preparing the •case for this Court, their agreement will be respected; but if they disagree in regard to time or any material thing to be done after the time allowed by law has expired, the whole contention will be disregarded and the rule of law will be applied.

In the present case it was agreed, as we understand the .affidavits, that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wade v. . City of NewbernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Glanton v. . JacobsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Stovall v. BreedloveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API