Legal Opinion

Covarrubias v. Superior Court of Monterey Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1998No. H016554PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, Acting P. J.

In this case, we determine whether section 223 of the Code of Civil Procedure, added by the June 5, 1990, adoption of Proposition 115, abrogates the holding in Hovey v. Superior Court (1980) 28 Cal.3d 1 [168 Cal.Rptr. 128, 616 P.2d 1301]. As we explain, we conclude section 223 abrogates Hovey's requirement of individual sequestered voir dire during the death qualification portion of a capital case. Section 223 does not require individual sequestered voir dire but leaves the matter to the trial court’s discretion. Because the trial court here did not exercise this…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. GuruleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. VieiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. BenavidesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API