Legal Opinion

Rohm & Haas Co. v. Lessner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1951No. Appeal, 230PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Defendants on July 19, 1943 entered into a written contract with plaintiff in which they undertook to furnish and install a boiler in the power house of the plaintiff company in Bristol. In Article 24 of the contract it is provided: “The Contractor shall save and hold harmless the Owner from and against all suits for claims that may be based upon any alleged injury (including death) to any person or property that may occur or that may be alleged to have occurred, in the course of the performance of this contract by the Contractor, whether such claim shall be made by an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wager v. Providence InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. John Wanamaker, New York, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Holladay v. FidlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. McCahan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Levin v. KapnekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McGee v. SINGLEYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Anderson v. Greenville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Wark & Co. v. Twelfth & Sansom Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Grossman v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co. v. General Controls, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API