Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Walters

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1977No. 7716SC201Published

1Dissent

Judge Britt

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent to the majority opinion awarding defendant a new trial on the ground that the trial judge committed reversible error in not allowing defendant to read the provisions of G.S. 14-17 and 14-18 to the jury. In view of the authorities cited in the majority opinion, I think the trial court erred but I do not think the error was sufficiently prejudicial to require a new trial.

It is well settled in this jurisdiction that a defendant has the burden not only to show error but also to show that the error complained of affected the result adversely to him.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. McMorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. SquireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API