State v. Walters
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
Judge Britt
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent to the majority opinion awarding defendant a new trial on the ground that the trial judge committed reversible error in not allowing defendant to read the provisions of G.S. 14-17 and 14-18 to the jury. In view of the authorities cited in the majority opinion, I think the trial court erred but I do not think the error was sufficiently prejudicial to require a new trial.
It is well settled in this jurisdiction that a defendant has the burden not only to show error but also to show that the error complained of affected the result adversely to him.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. McMorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. SquireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.