Legal Opinion

Wright v. Burhart

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1929No. Civil No. 2747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

David H. Burhart, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against F. A. Wright, hereinafter called defendant, both in his individual capacity and as trustee, claiming that defendant personally and as trustee was indebted to plaintiff on account of services rendered defendant at his special instance and request by plaintiff. The complaint, after reciting the usual preliminaries, alleged “That said defendant promised to pay plaintiff a reasonable price for his said services, together with all expenses which might be incurred for defendant; that said services were well worth the price and sum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Willard v. CarriganArizona Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merryman v. SearsArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hackin v. First National Bank of Arizona, PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Allen v. First National Bank of BatesvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  4. Benson Et Ux v. Madden Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Musgrove v. LeonardArizona Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API