Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Schmelzer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1999No. 98-1310PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings and the conclusion of the board as to a violation of DR 5-105(B) only. We adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months with the entire six months stayed. During the stay, respondent will be on probation and required to complete six hours of instruction in legal ethics and professionalism in addition to his normal Continuing Legal Education requirements. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. CowdenOhio Supreme Court · 2012