Legal Opinion

Bareham v. City of Rochester

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1927PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

The common council of the city of Rochester, assuming to exercise the authority conferred upon all cities of the State by article 12, sections 2 and 7, inclusive, of the Constitution and by chapter 363, Laws of 1924, enacted a local law superseding many provisions of its charter and of other statutes and radically changing the form of its government. Plaintiff, a taxpayer of that city, alleges that the whole local law is void and demands a declaratory judgment to that effect and an injunction to restrain the enforcement of the local law. Such parts of the local law as were considered by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of McCabe v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. People Ex Rel. Einsfeld v. . MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Sturgis v. . SpoffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Browne v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Schieffelin v. . HylanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Kamhi v. Town of YorktownNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Roth v. CuevasNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Turnpike Woods, Inc. v. Town of Stony PointNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Pacific Electric Railway Co. v. DeweyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API