Legal Opinion

McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. General Telephone Company of California and General Telephone and Electronics Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1979No. 75-3131PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:

McDonnell Douglas appeals here from an order granting General Telephone’s 1 motion for summary judgment in a suit in which McDonnell sought to recover excise taxes paid over a five and one-half year period on telephone services provided by General Telephone. The thrust df the district court’s order was that McDonnell had failed to state any cause of action under applicable federal statutory or common law.

McDonnell’s appeal presses the view that at least three causes of action were stated: First, General Telephone’s collection of excise taxes between 1966 and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Leeke v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Ivy Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and New York Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellees-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Enders v. Esquire Theaters of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Howard v. America Online Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Air Transport Association of America v. Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Mical Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Telemedia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. FTC v. At&t Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Mical Communications, Inc. v. Sprint Telemedia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API