Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Pierce

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1979No. 78-1164PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Commissioner seeks to reduce to judgment assessments for wagering excise taxes, as well as penalties and interest. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

FACTS

On October 12, 1965, the Los Angeles police arrested Pierce for bookmaking activities and seized his gambling records. Those showed that Pierce owed wagering taxes.

In federal and state prosecutions for gambling, Pierce’s motions to suppress the records were granted on Fourth Amendment grounds. Ruling on his suppression motion in the tax assessment case, however, was stayed pending resolution of Janis v. United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. RindskopfSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. United States v. Joseph G. LeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. MauroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  5. United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. PaladinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1982
  2. United States v. BarrettoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. United States v. PowellDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API