Legal Opinion

United States v. Mauro

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 30, 1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

A motion for reargument has been made by the taxpayer and consented to by the United States. The action seeks to reduce a jeopardy assessment of income tax liability to judgment. The facts shown upon this motion are as follows:(1) The defendant was and is presently domiciled in the State of New York, formerly residing at 155 East 52 Street, New York, N. Y. and 3824 Bronx Boulevard, Bronx, New York.(2) On February 15, 1962, an income tax liability for the year 1960 was assessed against defendant, Vincent Mauro, in the amount of $49,359.20, plus interest. This assessed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Meyer Harris Cohen, AKA Michael 'Mickey' Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. Joseph G. LeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. Joseph X. StreblerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc. v. United States of America, United States of America v. Sam A. Fiorella and Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Carter v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. United States v. TempelmanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
  5. United States v. BarrettoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API