First National Bank of Durant v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*547OPINION.
Love:
We are satisfied from the evidence that the amount of $5,195.62 was ascertained and known by petitioner on April 30, 1919, to be worthless. On that date Hynds & Co. owed petitioner an *548amount; in excess of $12,000. The agreement set forth in the findings of fact shows that a large part of this indebtedness was unsecured. The officers of the petitioner were well acquainted with the financial ability of the members of Hynds & Co. and their knowledge convinced them that at least a part of the unsecured debts could not be collected. They then made an agreement under which petitioner…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Henry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Estate of Harry M. Liggett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- First Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
- H. Thorman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
- Henry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960