Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Durant v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 16, 1927No. Docket No. 6913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*547OPINION.

Love:

We are satisfied from the evidence that the amount of $5,195.62 was ascertained and known by petitioner on April 30, 1919, to be worthless. On that date Hynds & Co. owed petitioner an *548amount; in excess of $12,000. The agreement set forth in the findings of fact shows that a large part of this indebtedness was unsecured. The officers of the petitioner were well acquainted with the financial ability of the members of Hynds & Co. and their knowledge convinced them that at least a part of the unsecured debts could not be collected. They then made an agreement under which petitioner…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  2. Estate of Harry M. Liggett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  3. First Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  4. H. Thorman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  5. Henry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API