Legal Opinion

Henry v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 3, 1960No. 581-57PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge (Retired).

Plaintiff sues for a refund of income tax for the year 1948. The tax was paid pursuant to a determination by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that a loss of $27,873.50, claimed by plaintiff as an ordinary loss, fully deductible as such under section 23(e) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C. (1952 ed.), § 23(e) (2), was a short-term capital loss arising from a non-business bad debt, under section 23 (k) (4) of the 1939 Code, 26 U.S.C. (1952 ed.), § 28(k) (4), and therefore subject to the $1,000 limitation on deductions for capital losses (§ 117(d)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Bingham v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. West Coast Sec. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SpreckelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  2. Kessel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. Swift v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API