Legal Opinion

First Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 16, 1927No. Docket No. 6913Published

Upon the evidence, deductions of a loss sustained in 1919 allowed; deductions of alleged bad debts in 1920 disallowed.

1Opinion of the Court

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DURANT, OKLAHOMA, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

First Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

Docket No. 6913.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

6 B.T.A. 545; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3485;

March 16, 1927, Promulgated

Upon the evidence, deductions of a loss sustained in 1919 allowed; deductions of alleged bad debts in 1920 disallowed.

Hubert L. Bolen, Esq., for the petitioner.

B. H. Saunders, Esq., for the respondent.

LOVE

This proceeding is to redetermine deficiencies in income and excess-profits taxes for the years 1919 and 1920, amounting to $2,893.88. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First National Bank of Durant v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API