Cable v. Marinette County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The issues raised by this appeal are whether the trial court was in error by granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and whether a new trial is necessary to prevent a probable miscarriage of justice.
Counsel for appellant concedes his motion for a new trial was not timely but it is his position on this appeal that this court, by sec. 251.09, Stats., can exercise its discretion and order a new trial under the circumstances presented in this appeal. Sec. 251.09 reads as follows:
“Discretionary Reversal. In any action or proceeding brought to the supreme court by appeal or writ of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kawiecka v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Raymond v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Fehrman v. Town of Pine RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Peake v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Hales v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walker v. BignellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Schicker v. LeickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Weiss v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Foss v. Town of KronenwetterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
- Bendorf v. City of DarlingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.