Legal Opinion

Cable v. Marinette County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

The issues raised by this appeal are whether the trial court was in error by granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and whether a new trial is necessary to prevent a probable miscarriage of justice.

Counsel for appellant concedes his motion for a new trial was not timely but it is his position on this appeal that this court, by sec. 251.09, Stats., can exercise its discretion and order a new trial under the circumstances presented in this appeal. Sec. 251.09 reads as follows:

“Discretionary Reversal. In any action or proceeding brought to the supreme court by appeal or writ of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kawiecka v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Raymond v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Fehrman v. Town of Pine RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Peake v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hales v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. BignellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Schicker v. LeickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Weiss v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Foss v. Town of KronenwetterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
  5. Bendorf v. City of DarlingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API