Legal Opinion

Schicker v. Leick

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1968No. 23PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The issue before us on this appeal is whether the liability of Sylvester Leick can be determined by summary judgment.

In Bolen v. Bolen (1968), 39 Wis. 2d 91, 94, 158 N. W. 2d 316, this court most recently discussed summary judgment:

"Summary judgment is a drastic remedy. But where there is no issue of fact that should be tried or where there is an issue of law that can be determined so as to conclude the case, summary judgment should be used. . . .”

Here we must determine whether under any construction of the facts contained in the affidavits submitted, the defendant can be held to owe a duty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strakos v. GehringTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Shupe Ex Rel. Shupe v. County of AntelopeNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Simonsen v. ThorinNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Kalkopf v. Donald Sales & Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bolen v. BolenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Misericordia Community HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Swatek v. County of DaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Beacon Bowl, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Yanta v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API