Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Scandic Wall Ltd. Partnership

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Barbara R. Kapnick, J.

Plaintiff Gil Sharp seeks to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly sustained on October 31, 1996 while work*255ing as an elevator mechanic. Plaintiff was allegedly directed by his supervisor at Millar Elevator to take elevator 35 at 40 Wall Street, which had not run for approximately 16 years, out of service. The elevator cab on which he was standing and working fell approximately 30 feet after he cut the cables holding the elevator based on his mistaken belief that the elevator had already landed on the bottom of the dark shaft.

Defendant 40…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Kyle v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Lindstedt v. 813 AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Nevins v. Essex Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Pisciotta v. St. John's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sharp v. Scandic Wall Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API