Lindstedt v. 813 Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated April 17, 1996, as denied their motion for summary judgment under Labor Law § 240 and granted the defendants’ and the third-party defendant’s separate cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action asserted in the complaint seeking to recover damages based upon violations of Labor Law §§ 240 and 241 (6).
Ordered that the” order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof reserving decision on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Tamara B. v. Pete F.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sciangula v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- McCullum v. Barrington Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Backiel v. Citibank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Farrell v. OkeicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Barrios v. Boston Properties LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- DiPilato v. H. Park Central Hotel, L.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Estate of CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.