Legal Opinion
Sharp v. Scandic Wall Ltd. Partnership
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered December 31, 2002, which, inter alia, granted defendant owner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs cause of action under Labor Law § 241-a, and granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment as to defendant’s liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In connection with the renovation of defendant’s building, plaintiff and a coworker were assigned to lower an inoperable elevator into the elevator pit. The task was performed from the top of the elevator cab with a pair of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Antonik v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Nevins v. Essex Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Sharp v. Scandic Wall Ltd. PartnershipNew York Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- Malloy v. Madison Forty-Five Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Campbell v. Columbus Centre LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Fernades v. Skanska USA Building Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2007
- Garcia v. DPA Wallace Avenue I, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Garcia v. DPA Wallace Avenue I, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.