Legal Opinion
Blaha v. Stuard
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTimm, Circuit Judge
[¶ 1.] This is an appeal from an order granting Stuards’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On December 17, 1998 Chad and Dustin Blaha traveled to Gary and Anna Stuard’s home to inquire about a labrador dog advertised in the Rapid City Journal. The advertisement stated:
Beautiful male Yellow Labrador, good Retriever, 5 years old, $50 with AKC papers and pedigree or free without. Call.
[¶ 3.] At the Stuard home, Gary showed Chad and Dustin the dog’s retrieving skills and they discussed what Chad planned to do with the dog. Chad told Gary that he wanted the dog for a Christmas…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Engberg v. Ford Motor CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Walz v. City of HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Peterson v. Safway Steel Scaffolds Co. of South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Stevens v. Wood Sawmill, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Sybesma v. SybesmaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- A.H. v. Church of God in Christ, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2019
- Janet Olier v. Donna BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
- Lindholm v. HassanDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2005
- Bethany Reynolds v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. Dave BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.