Legal Opinion

Long v. Nationwide Recovery Service, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided October 16, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00122Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION NATHAN M. LONG Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00122-RGJ NATIONWIDE RECOVERY SERVICE, Defendant INC., et al., * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Nathan M. Long (“Long”), and Defendant, Oliver Adjustment Company, Inc. (“OAC”) both moved for summary judgment. [DE 25; DE 24]. Each party filed responses and replies. [DE 26; DE 27; DE 28; DE 29]. OAC also moved for leave to file a sur-reply [DE 30] in response to new arguments raised in Long’s reply [DE 28]. Finding that Long raised new arguments in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Williams v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Daugherty v. Sajar Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API